Dimension overlap dream?

[sono]

Last night I went to bed with the request in my mind that I be taught something - anything new! I had a very vivid dream about an odd TV screen, with "layers" of simultaneously broadcast pictures - a scrambled hotch-potch of moving colours, & a voice explained it to me as an example of "crossed dimensions and overlap" - found it very intriguing!
Then this morning a googled around as usual & came across the new-to-me Burlington UFO & Paranormal site, where exactly this subject is discussed. . . !coincidence?!

[Beekeeper]

This link?

http://www.burlingtonnews.net/burlington_ufo_center

More information please, Sono.

[sono]

Yes, that's the one though I didn't enter through the page that your link leads directly to -I started out on the Research link & meandered around from there

[Beekeeper]

Thank you, Sono. :D

[wstein]

Beekeeper's link leads to a page with > 50 links.

Sono, can you give us a more specific link?

(if you are not permitted yet due to lack of posts PM me and I will post it)

-------------------------

There are many ways to look across dimensions. I'm not sure why this aspect is not discussed much in OBE groups. Perhaps the view is too overwhelming???

[sono]

Let's see if I can post the direct link: http://www.burlingtonnews.net/multiverses5b.html

[sono]

Aha, I see it posted - so here's another link : http://burlingtonnews.net/intradimensionalphotos.html
I found a lot of interesting items on this site - hope you do, too!

[wstein]

I don't see anything 'across dimensions'. They appear to be images of various energetic bodies appearing in normal scenes (similar to the claims on the captions). I can't tell if they are real of course.

Looking across or though dimensions are whole other things. There you can get stack of images as if viewing through a stack of photos. It those cases the entire landscape is visible, not just the beings. Sometimes it appears as looking transverse along the edge of a stack of CD Jewel cases.

[sono]

Oh, yes . . . that makes sense; I didn't think of that! Thanks! So there goes my "co-incidence". . .