dontco
1st July 2016, 10:01 PM
I ran into this and I thought this might be helpful, due to loads of threads on the subject that I can remember. I took it from here (http://www.gestaltreality.com/downloads/Compilation%20of%20Exercises%20-%20Seth%20and%20Jane%20Roberts.pdf).
"The past existed in multitudinous ways. You only experienced one probable past. By changingthis past in your mind, now, in your present, you can change not only its nature but its effect, andnot only upon yourself but upon others.
Pretend a particular event happened that greatly disturbed you. In your mind imagine it not simplywiped out, but replaced by another event of more beneficial nature. Now this must be done withgreat vividness and emotional validity, and many times. It is not a self-deception. The event thatyou choose will automatically be a probable event, which did in fact happen, though it is not theevent you chose to perceive in your given probable past.
Telepathically, if the process is done correctly, your idea will also affect any people who wereconnected with the original event, though they can choose to reject as well as accept yourversion.
This is not a book on techniques, so I will not go into this particular method deeply, but merelymention it here. Remember, however, that in a most legitimate way many events that are notphysically perceived or experienced are as valid as those that are, and are as real within yourown invisible psychological environment.
Any such moment is therefore a gateway into all of your existence. The events that you recognizeas happening now are simply specific and objective, but the most minute element in any givenmoment’s experience is also symbolic of other events and other times. Each moment is then likea mosaic, only in your current life history you follow but one color or pattern, and ignore theothers. As I have mentioned [in other books], you can indeed change the present to some extentby purposefully altering a memory event. That kind of synthesis can be used in many instanceswith many people.
Such an exercise is not some theoretical, esoteric, impractical method, but a very precise,volatile, and dynamic way of helping the present self by calming the fears of a past self. That pastself is not hypothetical, either, but still exists, capable of being reached and of changing itsreactions. You do not need a time machine to alter the past or the future.
Such a technique is highly valuable. Not only are memories not 'dead,' they are themselves everchanging.Many alter themselves almost completely without your notice. In his (unpublished)apprentice novels, Ruburt (Jane) did two or three versions of an episode with a priest he hadknown in his youth. Each version at the time he wrote it represented his honest memory of theevent. The bare facts were more or less the same, entire meaning and interpretation of eachversion differed so drastically that those differences far outweighed the similarities.Because the episode was used on two or three different occasions, Ruburt could see how thismemory changed. In most cases, however, people are not aware that memory changes in such afashion, or that the events they think they recall are so different.
The point is that past events grow. They are not finished. With that in mind, you can see thatfuture lives are very difficult to explain from within your framework. A completed life in your termsis no more completed or done than any event. There is simply a cutoff point in your focus fromyour framework, but it is as artificial as, basically, perspective is applied to painting.It is not that the inner self is not aware of all of this, but that it has already chosen a framework, ora given frame of existence, that emphasizes certain kinds of experience over others."
Good luck!
dontco.
"The past existed in multitudinous ways. You only experienced one probable past. By changingthis past in your mind, now, in your present, you can change not only its nature but its effect, andnot only upon yourself but upon others.
Pretend a particular event happened that greatly disturbed you. In your mind imagine it not simplywiped out, but replaced by another event of more beneficial nature. Now this must be done withgreat vividness and emotional validity, and many times. It is not a self-deception. The event thatyou choose will automatically be a probable event, which did in fact happen, though it is not theevent you chose to perceive in your given probable past.
Telepathically, if the process is done correctly, your idea will also affect any people who wereconnected with the original event, though they can choose to reject as well as accept yourversion.
This is not a book on techniques, so I will not go into this particular method deeply, but merelymention it here. Remember, however, that in a most legitimate way many events that are notphysically perceived or experienced are as valid as those that are, and are as real within yourown invisible psychological environment.
Any such moment is therefore a gateway into all of your existence. The events that you recognizeas happening now are simply specific and objective, but the most minute element in any givenmoment’s experience is also symbolic of other events and other times. Each moment is then likea mosaic, only in your current life history you follow but one color or pattern, and ignore theothers. As I have mentioned [in other books], you can indeed change the present to some extentby purposefully altering a memory event. That kind of synthesis can be used in many instanceswith many people.
Such an exercise is not some theoretical, esoteric, impractical method, but a very precise,volatile, and dynamic way of helping the present self by calming the fears of a past self. That pastself is not hypothetical, either, but still exists, capable of being reached and of changing itsreactions. You do not need a time machine to alter the past or the future.
Such a technique is highly valuable. Not only are memories not 'dead,' they are themselves everchanging.Many alter themselves almost completely without your notice. In his (unpublished)apprentice novels, Ruburt (Jane) did two or three versions of an episode with a priest he hadknown in his youth. Each version at the time he wrote it represented his honest memory of theevent. The bare facts were more or less the same, entire meaning and interpretation of eachversion differed so drastically that those differences far outweighed the similarities.Because the episode was used on two or three different occasions, Ruburt could see how thismemory changed. In most cases, however, people are not aware that memory changes in such afashion, or that the events they think they recall are so different.
The point is that past events grow. They are not finished. With that in mind, you can see thatfuture lives are very difficult to explain from within your framework. A completed life in your termsis no more completed or done than any event. There is simply a cutoff point in your focus fromyour framework, but it is as artificial as, basically, perspective is applied to painting.It is not that the inner self is not aware of all of this, but that it has already chosen a framework, ora given frame of existence, that emphasizes certain kinds of experience over others."
Good luck!
dontco.