PauliEffect
18th November 2012, 01:08 AM
I use a grade on the book from 0 - 10 (10 being the best/highest). I've read the book and can not decide
what kind of grade to give it. On a scale from 0 - 10, I'll hesitate between 5 to 8...
Cosmic Journey, 1999, Rosalind A McKnight
GRADE: 5.0 - 8.0
Long parts of the book are only some kind of transcripts from CHEC sessions, gave too little and became
a little repeating after a while. I also got the feeling that Rosalind is somewhat colored by religion, but I
might be wrong on this. The book has a problem, that is all Rosalind's testimonies were not remembered
by herself and only collected from recordings. Perhaps the problem is that Rosalind can't put her own
experiences into a deeper context, which gives the book a kind of "cut-off" appearance.
I liked the ending, the last part of the book became better than the middle part. If you like stuff about ETs
or UFOs, and that there are no time and no space, love is the prime energy, you might like this book. But
I got too little substance from the book. It is probably better to read Monroe's three books unless you're
very interested in everything about the Monroe Institute, even the fuzzy bits.
what kind of grade to give it. On a scale from 0 - 10, I'll hesitate between 5 to 8...
Cosmic Journey, 1999, Rosalind A McKnight
GRADE: 5.0 - 8.0
Long parts of the book are only some kind of transcripts from CHEC sessions, gave too little and became
a little repeating after a while. I also got the feeling that Rosalind is somewhat colored by religion, but I
might be wrong on this. The book has a problem, that is all Rosalind's testimonies were not remembered
by herself and only collected from recordings. Perhaps the problem is that Rosalind can't put her own
experiences into a deeper context, which gives the book a kind of "cut-off" appearance.
I liked the ending, the last part of the book became better than the middle part. If you like stuff about ETs
or UFOs, and that there are no time and no space, love is the prime energy, you might like this book. But
I got too little substance from the book. It is probably better to read Monroe's three books unless you're
very interested in everything about the Monroe Institute, even the fuzzy bits.